To All Those Muslims Burning & Protesting That Cartoon

Arab governments had a lot to do with this furor. There's no question that they incite hatred against the West among their citizens in order to deflect criticism of their own corrupt, horrible governments.

Read this Wall Street Journal article. It shows how this started. Western muslims didn't really have much of a problem here. Because there was no outrage in the West over these cartoons, a few Muslims presented the problem to Middle Eastern governments in hopes of inciting outrage. They even fabricated more cartoons which were not printed in the Danish paper.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(reek @ Feb 8 2006, 08:07 PM) [snapback]41769[/snapback][/center]
There's the heart of the problem. You believe in a utilitarian system wherein the majority rules over all else. Individual rights are not important if they conflict with the majority.

I believe in a system where individual rights are not sacrificed for the majority.

In other words, yes, my opinion is just as important as 2 billion muslims, and their opinions are just as important as mine. Just because 2 billion muslims may feel differently than I, it does not mean I do not have a right to my opinion. That's the greatness of free speech - it protects the minority.
[/b]


sorry reek, Islamic ethics follow a form of religious deontology, known as divine command ethics. Utilitarianism is the philosophical branch of teleology. The religious form of this would be Roman Catholicism, such as the teachings of Thomas Aquinas.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(reek @ Feb 8 2006, 09:39 PM) [snapback]41782[/snapback][/center]
Arab governments had a lot to do with this furor. There's no question that they incite hatred against the West among their citizens in order to deflect criticism of their own corrupt, horrible governments.

Read this Wall Street Journal article. It shows how this started. Western muslims didn't really have much of a problem here. Because there was no outrage in the West over these cartoons, a few Muslims presented the problem to Middle Eastern governments in hopes of inciting outrage. They even fabricated more cartoons which were not printed in the Danish paper.
[/b]

No argument there, but this is not unique to the Arab world.

Hell here in Canada, we have elected officials in our federal government whose sole purpose is (if you believe the rhetoric) to divide our country by separating Quebec from Canada.

The truth is that most of these people don't even believe the crap they're saying, but if it channels the anger and frustration of their constituents and keeps them elected....they continue pushing (but never hard enough to actually achieve their goals).

While the parallel here doesn't have the same deadly consequences, it's a reflection of the fact that in many places, those in governance who we trust with the task of making decisions in our best interests...seldom have those interests in mind when making decisions.

For an example closer to home, everyone is well aware of Bushs ulterior motives in the invasion of Iraq, yet he would put the lives of Americas soldiers at risk to achieve them.

This happens all over the world, sadly.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Stavrose @ Feb 8 2006, 09:40 PM) [snapback]41783[/snapback][/center]
sorry reek, Islamic ethics follow a form of religious deontology, known as divine command ethics. Utilitarianism is the philosophical branch of teleology. The religious form of this would be Roman Catholicism, such as the teachings of Thomas Aquinas.
[/b]
Lol, look at you trying to be all smurt-like, how cute!

Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that the actions of the people should be directed towards the happiness of the most possible people, even to the sacrifice of individual rights.

Hakan was making the claim that hurting the feelings of 2 billion muslims outweighs the importance of free speech for the individuals.

See the comparison?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Ruler-jimbo @ Feb 9 2006, 12:49 PM) [snapback]41788[/snapback][/center]
religion class makes me sleepy
[/b]

Wait till you take Western Civ.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(reek @ Feb 8 2006, 08:47 PM) [snapback]41786[/snapback][/center]
Lol, look at you trying to be all smurt-like, how cute!

Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that the actions of the people should be directed towards the happiness of the most possible people, even to the sacrifice of individual rights.

Hakan was making the claim that hurting the feelings of 2 billion muslims outweighs the importance of free speech for the individuals.

See the comparison?
[/b]

this isn't start trek, reek. This isn't a spock scenario. There is no "greater good" being weighed in his situation. He is making a comparison. And seriously, dust off those UofM degrees. Learn what islamic ethics are before speaking
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Timi @ Feb 9 2006, 12:51 PM) [snapback]41792[/snapback][/center]
Wait till you take Western Civ.
[/b]
waster civilization? like their religion? muslim and buddha and stuff like that? took it freshman year..judaism was especially boring :(
 
or civ. like civics? ok i have no idea what i am talking about..or you :P

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Stavrose @ Feb 9 2006, 12:54 PM) [snapback]41801[/snapback][/center]
and i know more about ethics than you do, trust me ;)
[/b]
prove it!

knowledge fight!!!!
knowledge fight!!!!
knowledge fight!!!!
knowledge fight!!!!
knowledge fight!!!!
knowledge fight!!!!
knowledge fight!!!!
knowledge fight!!!!
knowledge fight!!!!
knowledge fight!!!!
knowledge fight!!!!
knowledge fight!!!!

FINISH HIM!
 
no need to argue with a back country wetback who is trying to tell hakan what his culture's ethical system is lol. Hakan makes more than valid points about his culture, he can take it from here. He'll do a much better job than i can, since i'm not a Muslim
 
I think kicking a muslim might make you feel better. :D All kidding aside, my point is valid. Ignorant people burn shit and in this day and age there are more ignorant muslims than any other religion. You have ignorant people who will believe anything for a promise of a better life in the afterworld. If you are ignorant and your life sucks now, you get some cleric saying kill americans or jews, and you get 72 virgins in the after life, hell sweet deal to me. In fact Christianity should start remarketing to get us some virgins too. Though one side note, I believe 3 of the 72 virgins are Timi, fluffy, and noahthepurdy.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(El-Diablos @ Feb 8 2006, 10:14 PM) [snapback]41806[/snapback][/center]
you get 72 virgins in the after life, hell sweet deal to me.[/b]
You know, I always thought that was dumb. I mean a bunch of virgins are great sure, but god damn sometimes you want some experience. So give me like 65 virgins and 7 total sluts.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Stavrose @ Feb 8 2006, 10:03 PM) [snapback]41804[/snapback][/center]
no need to argue with a back country wetback who is trying to tell hakan what his culture's ethical system is lol. Hakan makes more than valid points about his culture, he can take it from here. He'll do a much better job than i can, since i'm not a Muslim
[/b]
Lol, you are so full of yourself it's amazing.

I said Hakan's argument, the specific argument that he was using, was a utilitarian one. I did not say anything about his culture's ethical system.

You are right about one thing, Hakan can argue much better than you. So get out of the thread and let the adults speak. Keep your conceited ignorance out of it.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(El-Diablos @ Feb 8 2006, 10:14 PM) [snapback]41806[/snapback][/center]
I think kicking a muslim might make you feel better. :D All kidding aside, my point is valid. Ignorant people burn shit and in this day and age there are more ignorant muslims than any other religion. You have ignorant people who will believe anything for a promise of a better life in the afterworld. If you are ignorant and your life sucks now, you get some cleric saying kill americans or jews, and you get 72 virgins in the after life, hell sweet deal to me. In fact Christianity should start remarketing to get us some virgins too. Though one side note, I believe 3 of the 72 virgins are Timi, fluffy, and noahthepurdy.
[/b]

Its not necessarily ignorant people though. More like uneducated or easily manipulated. In all religions there a zealots who go above and beyond the norm, usually violently so. We just had one quit at work because he was going to get fired. And he was Baptist, from the school here I mentioned earlier (long, entertaining story.) The thing is, these people aren't representative of their group as a whole, but they are the ones that get the most presstime and attention. So we tend to generalize the whole group as being that way. I'm sure the majority of the Muslims in the Middle East got offended, even if just minorly, but the nutjobs are the ones that started the whole trip, and those kinds of attitudes and actions are infectious. Which is why it took so long for this to build to the violent level its at now. A bunch of religious zealots kept pushing and pushing until they got enough normal people pissed to become a violent mob. Now they get featured in the press, so more people leaning that direction join in because they want their 15 minutes also.

And can we please stop the childish insults and name calling.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(reek @ Feb 8 2006, 09:23 PM) [snapback]41807[/snapback][/center]
You know, I always thought that was dumb. I mean a bunch of virgins are great sure, but god damn sometimes you want some experience. So give me like 65 virgins and 7 total sluts.
Lol, you are so full of yourself it's amazing.

I said Hakan's argument, the specific argument that he was using, was a utilitarian one. I did not say anything about his culture's ethical system.

You are right about one thing, Hakan can argue much better than you. So get out of the thread and let the adults speak. Keep your conceited ignorance out of it.
[/b]

hahaha, coming from someone who says i directly insulted him to begin with which justifies him for calling me a fucking moron, i'd rethink who is full of what ;) No wonder you have no friends :lol:
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Stavrose @ Feb 8 2006, 10:41 PM) [snapback]41810[/snapback][/center]
hahaha, coming from someone who says i directly insulted him to begin with which justifies him for calling me a fucking moron, i'd rethink who is full of what ;) No wonder you have no friends :lol:
[/b]
Stop acting like an idiot. You're lying now and it's just pathetic. You didn't directly insult me to begin with? You are actually saying this wasn't directed at me?
Quit viewing this from YOUR perspective. Just cause YOU don't do it doesn't make it right. Have a broader view on ethics and morals for fucks sake, you're not the only one that exists in the world. Quit preaching what is right and what is wrong, cause it doesnt apply to the rest of the world. If you want to go make political cartoons that bash the core value of Muslims, go ahead, just be sure to accept the consequences of it. And burning an American flag is definately not that serious to what is happening. it can't be comparable, quit using it as an example. The American flag is not some holy and sacred symbol in all americans that we'd kill for. I'd rather kill to save my family before i killed to prevent someone from burning an american flag. Muslims would kill to defend their religion before killing to save their family. thats how the world works. Grow up, adapt a more world-centric view, and quit trying to preach right from wrong cause YOU believe it.[/b]
Go on Stavrose, argue that you weren't referring to me in that quote.

Or conversely you could grow a pair of balls and say, "yeah I insulted him because he deserved it" rather than being some coward and saying it was an indirect insult. Weasel.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Micky Bulvaar @ Feb 9 2006, 12:28 PM) [snapback]41778[/snapback][/center]
I have to admit I'm seeing a different side of Hakan here, on I'm not used to seeing.
Regardless of whether I agree with his viewpoint or not, no one can claim he doesn't argue his point intelligently.
Guess that just goes to show you can't really judge someone by what you see by their forum posts huh?

I haven't weighed in on this topic yet, but I guess I'll throw my .02 in.
First off I'm coming from the perspective of a Canadian (who are widely held to be very tolerant of other faiths, sometimes maybe even to a fault, we don't subsbribe to a "melting pot" philosophy for example) who was schooled in Catholic schools, so no doubt my teachings were influenced by even a slight bias.

Havinmg said that, there is a significant difference between faith and religion.
To me faith is about ideals and core beliefs, and religion is about expression and guidelines.

No question that the basis of our laws and rules that govern how we interact with one another is deeply influenced by the predominant religions in the area in question.

Without religion, morality would be an individual determination, (and in many respects even with religions, it still is) and the way in which we interact with one another would be radically different.

The danger with religions, with any religion, is exactly as Hakan stated, it can used as a means to manipulate those that subscribe to it blindly.

Its not a Muslim thing, its apparent in every religion.

Protestants and Catholics have been killing each other for decades.
Muslims and Jews, Jews and Christians, Christians and Muslims....

This is why I have problems with generalizations which paint an entire faith with the same brush.

Sadly too there are those whose violent retaliations have nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with opportunism.

Consider similar events not even linked to religion such as the Watts riots or the looting in New Orleans after the devastation.

Yes I do believe that the newspaper had the right to publish those cartoons.
I also believe strongly that the government of Denmark has no place in censoring or limiting the media in that country.
To do otherwise is to open a door to an Orwellian type of governance which I think everyone agrees is the last place we want to go.

On the other hand, the reaction to this was most definately predictable.

There exists within the Muslim world, groups that advocate this type of action against infidels, and these groups seize on any opportunity like this to advance their message.

In the end, the only thing thats really missing here is understanding.

Understanding by the paper in question of the repercussions its choice would bring, and understanding by these radicals that every action by those outside the Muslim world is not a directed affront against Mohammed or Allah.

Its a sad situation but one that will continue long after all of us are gone.
[/b]

There are certain issues which needs to be clearified. First of all I will say this to suprise everyone, the most close regime to a true islamic regime atm on world is U.S. There are ofcourse differences regarding laws but the U.S. constitution is indeed a good one for which I do respect the founding fathers of the U.S. greatly.

I said faith for the simple reason that in Islam faith is essential. A true muslim should question the existance of Allah first, then Quran and probhets. Unlike christianity Islam denies any human being including the probhet any divine power. Probhet is a human being and hes the messanger but he can make mistakes as a human being just like any other one. Quran is not his teaching, its a divine message, coming right from Allah and teaches the answer to the very question which is asked by any thinking human being, whom am I, where did I come from and where am I going. Once you accept the existance of Allah and Quran being the divine message, you can no longer question its orders as it means you challange the divine message. For this reason a true muslim who acquired faith through questioning has no doubt whatsoever for the message delivered by Allah.There is nothing inbetween a muslim and Allah, thats why Islam in fact doesnt have a cleric class.

Nations like Iran and S.Arabia are quite far from the spirit of Quran. They are totalarian regimes, there is a long struggle in these countries including Turkey to turn to the true roots of Islam. Ppl are sent to jail in the past for this and it still needs a lot of time to beat the oppression.

The problems with the Western world and Islam world in general goes back to 1st WW basicly. It starts with an English spy called Lawrence. He promised a lot of things to Bedevi's (if I am not mistaken that tribe is situated in Syria now) However after 1st WW both England and France didnt accept to keep their promises and arabs paid the price of betraying their brethern. An artificial middle east map was created. None of the Arab nations of today apart fm Egypt have a nation history. Even Egypt under Ottoman rule was like an independant state in interior affairs but was still part of the Ottoman empire just like many other states. After 2nd WW Russia tried to influence the region aswell becoz of rich oil fields. There was a coup in Iraq with which Baas regime came to power which was close to Russia, Syria and Egypt under Nasir dictatorship also chose to ally with U.S.S.R. In this period there was an unsuccesful capture try by the English and French on Suez Canal. And the forced instution of Israel. For over 30 years M.East was a fighting and testing grounds for the U.S.S.R. and U.S. Under the influence and aid of U.S.S.R, arabs time after time tried to destroy Israel which ended at Golan heights with the victory of Israel. Now defeating arabs over and over again Israel gained quite a bit of land. And especially Jerusalem. Palestinians and Yaser Arafat was used by those totalarian regimes as to forget the inner problems and use it as a decieving factor for their own populace. Iran was under Pehlevi regime which was also totalarian and in pact with the U.S. Possibly Iran at that time was the only nation U.S sold F-15s. However the iranian ppl were not happy with Shah Pehlevi and they rioted under Humeyni and U.S made a big mistake by freezing Iranian funds which ended up with the embassy crisis. I am guessing the american governments never forgot the humiliating experience of the embassy crisis and instead of coming to an agreement with the new Iranian regime, they kept it hostile. I see this as a major mistake and prolly its one of the main reasons which still keeps the hostilities. Making Jerusalem capital was an other mistake in the region. I found it very amusing to see in Sum of All Fears, Tom Clancy offered the very same solution , I was thinking with the only exception of Swiss troops instead of Turkish troops. Please do remember that muslims, jews and christians lived in peace for 400 years in the region in peace under Ottoman empire. Jerusalem is a holly city for all 3 religions.

Things changed in region, Carter era brought peace between Israel and Egypt. The whole situation was and is still getting better also with death of Hafiz Esad the Syrian president. U.S. made an other error with Saddam, trying to use him as a pawn against Iran. I wish Turkey took a more involving role as a protective for the region with U.S but due to religious concerns of secular Turkish army, Turkey stayed away from it. At the end U.S found herself in a very hard position, the extremists used christianity factor against U.S and U.S made an other error with the 1st gulf War. The error is more of a calculation error to try to use Iraq for their own ends to control the region. With the current U.S admin its no secret that U.S chose a more military control approach for the region which is very dangerous. Please visit the link I gave before for a better understanding of the current administration's plans over the region.

From now on the question is how to end the hostilities. First of all I believe U.S needs to cease any support she gives to totalarian regimes in the region especially S.Arabia. U.S needs to leave Iraq asap. U.S needs to decrease hostilities with Iran. Iran apart fm other nations in the region except Turkey has a long nation history and can easily flourish and decrease the totalarian regime rapidly if the pressure is decreased. Keep in mind that under pressure its easier for the current regime to pump hostilities and thus keep the current regime active. Nuclear power and or weapons is a totally different subject and this post is already too long than i intented to do at the 1st place. I hope u can have a better understanding on the region and the artificial hatred towards U.S..
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(reek @ Feb 8 2006, 09:52 PM) [snapback]41812[/snapback][/center]
Stop acting like an idiot. You're lying now and it's just pathetic. You didn't directly insult me to begin with? You are actually saying this wasn't directed at me?

Go on Stavrose, argue that you weren't referring to me in that quote.

Or conversely you could grow a pair of balls and say, "yeah I insulted him because he deserved it" rather than being some coward and saying it was an indirect insult. Weasel.
[/b]

I hadn't even read your posts, otherwise i would've mentioned your name. I don't read every post on this. This most recent one when i said YOU had no friends WAS directed at YOU, and it seems i hit a nerve :D Besides, i don't need to hide if i want to insult you, cause you're an internet pussy. YOu talk big shit over the net, cause thats all you know how to do. You say you're an adult but your maturity over the past months in the flame wars forum has proven otherwise. No don't go say "what makes you think you are an adult" cause i never said i was. just getting that out of the way cause a failed abortion like yourself will take that as the most likely path. I have no problem directing insults at you. If i had read your posts, i would have directed it towards you. But i don't read your posts until you bring me up as of recently, cause you're not worth reading. you're a pathetic loser. You boast intelligence and degrees but spend countless hours flaming the stupidest shit on these forums. Reality check, reek. You played a game for over two years and have wasted two years of your life flaming people BECAUSE of a game. See, i can talk shit to you directly if i want to. But honestly, i didnt see or read your posts. I had no clue what you were arguing, cause i don't like reading your worthless shit of posts. But hey, every forum has to have its boytoy, so i guess i can't blame you
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Hakan @ Feb 8 2006, 10:54 PM) [snapback]41814[/snapback][/center]
From now on the question is how to end the hostilities. First of all I believe U.S needs to cease any support she gives to totalarian regimes in the region especially S.Arabia. U.S needs to leave Iraq asap. U.S needs to decrease hostilities with Iran. Iran apart fm other nations in the region except Turkey has a long nation history and can easily flourish and decrease the totalarian regime rapidly if the pressure is decreased. Keep in mind that under pressure its easier for the current regime to pump hostilities and thus keep the current regime active. Nuclear power and or weapons is a totally different subject and this post is already too long than i intented to do at the 1st place. I hope u can have a better understanding on the region and the artificial hatred towards U.S..
[/b]
Heh, for the record I would agree with nearly everything in this paragraph. The House of Saud needs to be brought down.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Stavrose @ Feb 8 2006, 11:02 PM) [snapback]41817[/snapback][/center]
I hadn't even read your posts[/b]
Liar. You referred to comparisons of burning the American flag. I was the only one bringing that example up. Really pathetic that you feel the need to lie.

As for your "you don't have any friends" and all your personal attacks, knock yourself out bro, lol.
 
LOL, virtually every sentance in that paragraph is true and you know it. And yeah reek, i got the burning of the american flag idea from you LOL. It was by no means on the news this past week HAHAHA. Wait, LOL< the muslims got that idea from you! HAH, terrorist!
 
Back
Top