Fluffy
Vote Stewart/Colbert in '08!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Stavrose @ Sep 17 2006, 04:47 PM) [snapback]117605[/snapback][/center]
Whoa, whoa, whoa. Speaking of haters, here we are. You made a poll about if you would buy a PS3, the people on this board answered. It is not "PS3 haters", it is people that are sick of two things. One Sony's blatant disregard of their customers, DRM, rootkit, etc. then two, the price...which isn't $400, I dunno where you got the PS3 price to be $400 from. (Oh, I found it, from a speculation press release over a year ago, yeah, way to stay on top of it).
I have seen the PS3's new controllers, yeah, they saw what the Wii was doing and loosely tried to copy it, and failed miserably. They still advertise the core system with these controllers. They added gyro sensors in a last minute effort (this is obvious because they quickly removed the rumble packs from the controllers in a design mistake) to combat what the Wii was advertising.
So, this "next-gen" console offers the same exact functionality and system as it's previous version but with better graphics. Then expect people to pay 3x times as much as the other consoles that actually comes with a game in the box and a completely free online service. As for the WIi's lack of graphics, this is what Mario 64 looked like, and this is what Mario Galaxy looks like.
No, these are not Sony "haters" (hell I owned a PS1 and PS2, and not to mention I love my widescreen Sony TV), nor are these folks who "bitches about something they can't afford or can't have, no matter how good it is", get over yourself with that comment, I guarentee you I pull in a shitload more than you Stav, what an asinine comment. Not to mention you are the same person who argued with me over $5 fucking dollars a month with the Netflix/Blockbuster arguement, and you of all people are arguing that people are cheap?!?!?!?!??!?! Holy shit. What a hypocrit.
Buy your PS3, have fun with it, but the majority of folks here are going to spend less money, get more games, more functionality, more online services, and not have to worry about faulty hardware (sorry, the PS2 was billed as a DVD player as well as a game system, it failed miserably as a DVD player)...but you'll have better graphics...../golfclap
heh, if you track all the ps3 vs 360 vs wii comparisons and arguments over the past 6 months, you will notice a trend. The argument went from which system was better and more powerful (which ps3 won). After winning, the people who still hated the ps3 cause of sony shifted over to usability (360 media center, xbox live, wii's new controls). PS3 crowd won again on half the argument after introducing new controllers, other half (games) had no winner. So the anti-ps3 crowd resorted to price, bashing the 600-900 price tag the PS3 was boasting. When PS3 announced the prices to be 399-499, disgruntled anti-PS3ites are now resorting to quality of hardware, drawing upon the flaws of the PS2 to bash the PS3.
And now, to squash this argument: you guys are bitching about hardware of an older system. Well shit, then let me say how amazing the hardware of the original PS was. I hereby declare your bitchings about the PS2 hardware flaws NULL AND VOID. I swear, if the PS3 was priced at $200, nobody would be bitching about it. Everyone bitches about something they can't afford or can't have, no matter how good it is. Now, just admit that the PS3 is all around better than both the wii and the 360, and leave me to spend my $500 without your criticism so i can be playing next-gen games within a year while you people try to convince yourselves how amazing the wii's controller is while coping with mario's polygonal facial structure that has been unimproved since the n64
[/b]
Whoa, whoa, whoa. Speaking of haters, here we are. You made a poll about if you would buy a PS3, the people on this board answered. It is not "PS3 haters", it is people that are sick of two things. One Sony's blatant disregard of their customers, DRM, rootkit, etc. then two, the price...which isn't $400, I dunno where you got the PS3 price to be $400 from. (Oh, I found it, from a speculation press release over a year ago, yeah, way to stay on top of it).
I have seen the PS3's new controllers, yeah, they saw what the Wii was doing and loosely tried to copy it, and failed miserably. They still advertise the core system with these controllers. They added gyro sensors in a last minute effort (this is obvious because they quickly removed the rumble packs from the controllers in a design mistake) to combat what the Wii was advertising.
So, this "next-gen" console offers the same exact functionality and system as it's previous version but with better graphics. Then expect people to pay 3x times as much as the other consoles that actually comes with a game in the box and a completely free online service. As for the WIi's lack of graphics, this is what Mario 64 looked like, and this is what Mario Galaxy looks like.
No, these are not Sony "haters" (hell I owned a PS1 and PS2, and not to mention I love my widescreen Sony TV), nor are these folks who "bitches about something they can't afford or can't have, no matter how good it is", get over yourself with that comment, I guarentee you I pull in a shitload more than you Stav, what an asinine comment. Not to mention you are the same person who argued with me over $5 fucking dollars a month with the Netflix/Blockbuster arguement, and you of all people are arguing that people are cheap?!?!?!?!??!?! Holy shit. What a hypocrit.
Buy your PS3, have fun with it, but the majority of folks here are going to spend less money, get more games, more functionality, more online services, and not have to worry about faulty hardware (sorry, the PS2 was billed as a DVD player as well as a game system, it failed miserably as a DVD player)...but you'll have better graphics...../golfclap