Supreme Court Rejects Condemned Inmate's Final Appeal

DrewPA

New member
Supreme Court Rejects Condemned Inmate's Final Appeal
By Henry Weinstein and Hector Becerra, Times Staff Writers

The U.S. Supreme Court today denied a final appeal by California's oldest prisoner on death row, clearing the way for the execution of Clarence Ray Allen in the first moments of Tuesday.

Allen, 76, is scheduled to die at 12:01 a.m. for a triple murder he ordered from behind bars 25 years ago to silence witnesses.

ADVERTISEMENT
Lawyers for Allen argued that executing the ill, old man would violate constitutional bans on cruel and unusual punishment. Allen is legally blind, almost deaf and needs a wheelchair.

Allen would be the 13th person to undergo capital punishment in California since the state reinstated the death penalty in 1977.

State officials were preparing to put Allen to death a week after the Assembly Public Safety Committee approved a bill that would suspend capital punishment for up to three years. During that time, a commission would study whether California's criminal justice system has allowed innocent people to be convicted of crimes, both capital and noncapital. It is far from certain that the bill will clear the Legislature, and even if it does, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger may veto the measure.

Allen was sentenced to death in 1982 for orchestrating a triple murder in Fresno in 1980. He had arranged the killings while incarcerated at Folsom State Prison, serving a life sentence for another murder.

He had been convicted of arranging the 1974 slaying of his son's girlfriend, Mary Sue Kitts, who had told the owners of a Fresno market that Allen's gang had burglarized their store. According to testimony in the 1982 trial, Allen sought to eliminate witnesses who might testify against him if he got a retrial in the Kitts killing.

In prison, he offered $25,000 to fellow inmate Billy Ray Hamilton to kill people who had testified against him in the Kitts murder trial. After he was paroled, Hamilton killed one of the witnesses and two bystanders. When Hamilton ? who also is on death row ? was captured, police found that he had a list of eight witnesses who had testified against Allen in the Kitts trial.

Allen's case has attracted considerably less attention than that of Stanley Tookie Williams, 51, who was executed Dec. 13 despite a vigorous clemency campaign waged by political and religious leaders.

Nonetheless, Allen's appellate attorneys continued to work on his behalf over the weekend, and death penalty foes have planned a march from San Francisco to San Quentin today to protest the execution.

In recent weeks, two federal judges and the California Supreme Court have rejected motions by Allen's lawyers to bar his execution because of his age and poor health.

From a legal point of view, U.S. District Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. said in a ruling released Thursday, that argument has no relevance. The U.S. Supreme Court has barred the execution of individuals for crimes committed as juveniles, as well as individuals who are mentally incompetent to understand the gravity and meaning of their execution. But the high court has never ruled that it is improper to execute someone because of old age or poor health.

"Nothing about his advanced age or his physical infirmities affected his culpability at the time he committed the capital offenses," Damrell wrote.

He drew a sharp contrast between Allen and juvenile offenders, noting that in a landmark decision in 2005 the high court said juveniles are immature with impulsive tendencies, have a greater vulnerability to negative influences and have more transitory personality traits. "Clearly, none of these differences apply to a mature adult like [Allen] who committed multiple murders with cold-blooded calculation at age 50," Damrell wrote.

The judge also said the argument of Allen's attorneys that "his execution would serve none of the penological purposes of capital punishment is without merit. [Allen's] current condition is irrelevant to the fulfillment of those purposes."

Damrell quoted a 2005 decision of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in which Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw wrote: "If the death penalty is to serve any purpose at all, it is to prevent the very sort of murderous conduct for which Allen was convicted."

On Sunday, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed one of Allen's final legal appeals. The San Francisco-based court ruled against Allen "because he has not demonstrated substantial grounds upon which relief may be granted."

On Friday, Schwarzenegger denied Allen's clemency bid. "Allen's crimes are the most dangerous sort because they attack the justice system itself," Schwarzenegger said in rejecting the bid. "The depravity of Allen's crimes has not diminished with the years."

As Allen's final appeal was being reviewed by judges in Washington, his relatives and the relatives of his victims were in a pensive mood about the impending execution.

Patricia Pendergrass, the 55-year-old sister of Bryon Schletewitz, one of the three people gunned down at his parents' Fresno store by Allen's hired killer, said she planned to attend the execution.

Supreme Court Rejects Condemned Inmate's Final Appeal


Page 2 of 2 << back 1 2

Pendergrass, of Galt, Calif., said she was the last living member of her family, since her father, Ray, was run over last March by a driver later convicted of vehicular manslaughter. She said her father had wanted to live to see Allen's execution.

Pendergrass said what made Allen's murders even more egregious is that he had known Bryon and her since they were 9 and 11 years old, respectively.

ADVERTISEMENT
"Let's not forget why he's there in the first place," Pendergrass said in a telephone interview last week. "He committed these crimes, and he knew there would be consequences. He thought about this; there was no snap judgment. He planned this. He put in a lot of time and effort.

"I'm really hoping I find some relief from this, after all these years, [with] this hanging over our heads. All the trials, all the court dates and appeals and all those times when it seemed we were getting close to a date set.

"I try to remember all the good things, and there were so many good things with my family. Then how Bryon was forced to die slips into my mind, and all the ugliness comes back."

Schletewitz, then 27, and store employees Josephine Rocha, 17, and Douglas Scott White, 18, were killed at close range with a shotgun, according to trial testimony.

Cecilia Broughton, Rocha's sister, said that while some of her six siblings would attend the execution, she would stay overnight with their mother to offer support. She was unsympathetic to the argument that Allen should not be put to death because of his age and poor health. She contrasted the years that he was allowed to live with the fate of her sister, then a high school senior, who died begging for her life, according to trial testimony.

Broughton said that despite her efforts to focus on happy memories of her sister, they are overwhelmed by the way in which she died. "She had had the whole world ahead of her, and of course I imagine her begging and crying for her life," she said.

Broughton said Allen's death would finally end fears that have at times gripped his victims' survivors. "Whether or not it seems reasonable," she said, "there's a lingering fear that he can still hurt people outside of prison."

Paula Allen, the condemned inmate's granddaughter, issued a statement through Allen's appellate attorneys.

"My heart goes out to the families of all of the victims in this tragic situation that, over the years, has brought about nothing but sheer pain, confusion and needless loss to all involved," she said.

"I will never know the pain the victims' families suffered at the time of their loved one's deaths, however great it must have been, and surely still is. I only know for certain the excruciating pain my own family has had to endure for nearly the past three decades as the result of hatred toward my grandfather. I also know that we, too, will soon suffer the loss of a man dearly loved by his entire family."

"I pray," Paula Allen said, "that his execution will finally begin a process of healing for all of the surviving families on both sides of this sad circumstance."
 
I'm sorry but the man was full of his faculties when he commited the crimes, and thus I feel he should be executed. He was lawfully found guilty, he was lawfully sentenced.

I think that's one of the main problems with our country today. We seem to have different penalties for different people. Like that schoolteacher that wasn't getting any jailtime in Florida for having sex with a child, if it had been a man they would have thrown the book at him. I think the judge there that denied the plea bargain also did the right thing.

I think really speaking judges have to much latitude in giving sentences, there shouldn't be a large span. Sentences for crimes should be already strictly stated. Its like the crazy judge in Vermont that sentenced a sexual offender who also targeted children to only 60 days, I'm sorry but taking away the innocence of a child needs to be worth more than 60 days.

Anyway I better stop babbling.
 
Waaaaa I'm too old to be executed waaaaa....

FRY HIM! The convict, the convict, the convicts on fire. We don't need no water let the MF'er burn!

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mecinia Lu-a @ Jan 17 2006, 09:57 AM) [snapback]29039[/snapback][/center]
I'm sorry but the man was full of his faculties when he commited the crimes, and thus I feel he should be executed. He was lawfully found guilty, he was lawfully sentenced.

I think that's one of the main problems with our country today. We seem to have different penalties for different people. Like that schoolteacher that wasn't getting any jailtime in Florida for having sex with a child, if it had been a man they would have thrown the book at him. I think the judge there that denied the plea bargain also did the right thing.

I think really speaking judges have to much latitude in giving sentences, there shouldn't be a large span. Sentences for crimes should be already strictly stated. Its like the crazy judge in Vermont that sentenced a sexual offender who also targeted children to only 60 days, I'm sorry but taking away the innocence of a child needs to be worth more than 60 days.

Anyway I better stop babbling.
[/b]

Lets not forget the child molester in Vermont that got 60 days in jail for continuously rapping a poor little girl because the judge felt there was no point in throwing the book at him. Talk about not doin your job and being an unsympathetic, pompous, and lazy piece of shit.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mecinia Lu-a @ Jan 16 2006, 11:57 PM) [snapback]29039[/snapback][/center]
I'm sorry but the man was full of his faculties when he commited the crimes, and thus I feel he should be executed. He was lawfully found guilty, he was lawfully sentenced.

I think that's one of the main problems with our country today. We seem to have different penalties for different people. Like that schoolteacher that wasn't getting any jailtime in Florida for having sex with a child, if it had been a man they would have thrown the book at him. I think the judge there that denied the plea bargain also did the right thing.

I think really speaking judges have to much latitude in giving sentences, there shouldn't be a large span. Sentences for crimes should be already strictly stated. Its like the crazy judge in Vermont that sentenced a sexual offender who also targeted children to only 60 days, I'm sorry but taking away the innocence of a child needs to be worth more than 60 days.

Anyway I better stop babbling.
[/b]

nah you need a certain span for mitigating circumstances, no two crimes are the same...howver i do feel that some judges take the piss.
 
The death penalty is wrong even if the person killed countless people. It's not our place to make the decision whether or not somebody should live.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Timi @ Jan 17 2006, 10:05 AM) [snapback]29045[/snapback][/center]
Waaaaa I'm too old to be executed waaaaa....

FRY HIM! The convict, the convict, the convicts on fire. We don't need no water let the MF'er burn!
Lets not forget the child molester in Vermont that got 60 days in jail for continuously rapping a poor little girl because the judge felt there was no point in throwing the book at him. Talk about not doin your job and being an unsympathetic, pompous, and lazy piece of shit.
[/b]
this is why when they say "death" in the penelty, you take hoim out back of the courthouse, and string him up, instead of making the taxpayers pay to keep him alive another 20 yrs
 
I read this case, he was proven guilty beyond a doubt, in this case of no mistaken identity, the man proven 100% guilty with not even an incling of I didnt do it -- and not proof to show otherwise -- he should have his sentance carried out.

In this day and age, with no discrimination for age, race, gender, handicap -- no esceptiopn should be made.
 
I also agree with meci. :mellow:

as far as who has the right to decide on who lives and dies mr curse, who would if not the convicted persons piers? (i.e. us)
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Curse @ Jan 17 2006, 11:26 PM) [snapback]29153[/snapback][/center]
The death penalty is wrong even if the person killed countless people. It's not our place to make the decision whether or not somebody should live.
[/b]

Hmpf, the convicted felon did not share your view on the matter. He very much decided to kill those 3 people. This wasn't a random act of violence, this was cold, and calculating. His conviction and sentence matched his crime.
 
I hate this topic. I hate the idea of killing people because we're not God to dictate who lives and who dies. On the other hand, our prisons are over-flowing.

Because of this, I don't like the death-penalty, but often feel it's necessary.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Tiveria @ Jan 18 2006, 01:03 AM) [snapback]29215[/snapback][/center]
I hate this topic. I hate the idea of killing people because we're not God to dictate who lives and who dies. On the other hand, our prisons are over-flowing.

Because of this, I don't like the death-penalty, but often feel it's necessary.
[/b]

The death penalty ain't gonna solve over-population in prisons....making certain drugs legal will take care of that. So, don't support captial punishment if over-crowding is the issue.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Fluffy @ Jan 18 2006, 01:06 AM) [snapback]29220[/snapback][/center]
The death penalty ain't gonna solve over-population in prisons....making certain drugs legal will take care of that. So, don't support captial punishment if over-crowding is the issue.
[/b]

:blink:

I guess you all can see that the capital punishment issue is not black and white but very grey as is our entire legal system.

But thats just the opinion of someone who is bored :P and spent way too much time last night watching law and order.
 
He be dead.
they had to give him two shots as one did not put the old bat down.
BTW yesterday was his birthday. I do not feel bad at all his ass had 4 people killed. I hope he burns in hell.

We got one more person coming up for death next month so stay tuned for death watch 2006.....
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(scally666 @ Jan 17 2006, 10:06 AM) [snapback]29219[/snapback][/center]
Allen is legally blind, almost deaf and needs a wheelchair.

will be doing him a favor then
[/b]
QFE. Besides if he didn't keep appealing it and just let them juice him he wouldn't of been blind and deaf.
 
Back
Top