Actually, I kind of agree with her point of view...she should be suing Playboy for use of the image. It is false advertising and she expressly refused to be in Playboy (that bitch) so she would not be associated with it.
[/b]
same..except thats not my nameI am Stavrose and I endorse this message
[/b]
i found that article to be... shallow and pedantic. nah, it was just really wordy
[/b]
and truefully they really would be profiting from her image, since most guys will see her on the cover, think she did a nude spread anyway, and pick up the mag without reading the coveror antyhingActually, I kind of agree with her point of view...she should be suing Playboy for use of the image. It is false advertising and she expressly refused to be in Playboy (that bitch) so she would not be associated with it.
[/b]