It's because the athletes that play American Football are bigger, faster, and stronger than the players of both Soccer and Rugby.We don't need pussy body armour, and helmets what the fuck?
It's because the athletes that play American Football are bigger, faster, and stronger than the players of both Soccer and Rugby.
I'd like to see how the soccer pansies would do at the NFL Scouting Combine when it comes to the 40 and the bench press.
Oh, and by the way, I wasn't referring to American Football specifically as the greatest game, but that particular game, Boise State against Oklahoma in the 2007 Fiesta Bowl.
Was I talking about Soccer, No. Rugby players have to be fitter because they play for a straight 80 minutes, with a 10 minute half time at the 40 mark. Whilst this there only allowed a few interchanges, no offense and defense teams here.
An Average prop forward is about 260 pounds for agilty purposes, but some can get up 350 and still pack a punch. If you really think NFL players, are fitter, and faster stronger than rugby players you are dillusional.
Oh, and when it comes to strength and fitness soccer players are bigger built than you realise the they'd easily get through the fitness regimes inposed by a combine.
But, your statements about the World Football being able to take part in NFL Football combines is just way off base. Not even close. Just two completely different sports, the one is more geared for endurance the other is more geared for short control bursts of power. Can't compare the two at all.